Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,572 of 17,520    |
|    Steven Carlip to stargene    |
|    Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a    |
|    25 Feb 17 16:36:41    |
      From: carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu              On 2/24/17 4:12 AM, stargene wrote:              [...]       > Regardless of any particular interpretation of the mechanism of       > Hawking's well-known radiation at the actual event horizon, my question       > still stands (at least for me!)              > Ie: Can there be a sort of poor man's version of HR, however weak,       > simply due to the extremely steep potential gradient, which would exist       > at a tiny distance r=10^-7 m, say, from the collapsar's surface, even       > before it's surface precisely matches the r_s or Schwarzschild radius       > for that given mass M, a fraction of a second later??              This question, or at least something like it, is addressed by Barcelo       et al., arxiv.org/abs/1011.5593, or for an earlier variation with       condensed matter analogs, arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0607008. The answer       (if I'm understanding the question right) is that you don't need a       horizon to form in order to have Hawking radiation, but you do need       exponential "peeling" of geodesics, which basically requires an       exponentially large blue shift as a light ray approaches the surface.              Steve Carlip              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca