Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,582 of 17,516    |
|    Rich L. to Nicolaas Vroom    |
|    Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem    |
|    04 Mar 17 07:25:12    |
      From: ralivingston1952@charter.net              On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 10:03:00 PM UTC-6, Nicolaas Vroom wrote:       ...       > My whole point is:       > First you have to demonstrate the Bell inequality (is correct)       > This requires at least one experiment which is in agreement with       > the Bell inequality.       ...       > Nicolaas Vroom.              The Bell Inequality is a mathematical theorem. You should read Bell's       paper on this. There is no physical reasoning involved in its       derivation.              The APPLICATION of Bell's inequality to physics involves an       interpretation of the physics and an application of the inequality to       the physics. By testing the physics against the inequality you test the       assumptions of that interpretation and your understanding of the       physics. Bell's Inequality has been proven by mathematical theorem.       You do not need to, and cannot, prove or disprove it experimentally.              Rich L.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca