From: eaglesondouglas@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 2:58:55 PM UTC+8, James Goetz wrote:   
   > On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 4:56:48 AM UTC-4, Ned Latham wrote:   
   > > James Goetz wrote:   
   > > > Ned Latham wrote:   
   > > > > James Goetz wrote:   
      
   for what it is worth.  The inference of distance used in   
   a red shift theory is either based on the level of   
   red shift or some other observation such as a parallax   
   observation.  What if the observable is in argument?   
      
   Is there something other to see such as a clock emission   
   of light from some stars?   
      
   No.   
      
   So discuss validity of parallax distance measure. Some   
   people see this theory as a fallacy.  The validity relies   
   on a relative angle between???  I can not exactly   
   explain the argument, but give thought to the necessity   
   to have a star with an otherwise determined distance to   
   allow solution of the unknown star distance.   
      
   Solving with the solution is a theory form that causes   
   a quandary.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)