Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,625 of 17,516    |
|    Lawrence Crowell to matmzc%ho...@gtempaccount.com    |
|    Re: Photon spin    |
|    25 May 17 14:50:19    |
   
   From: goldenfieldquaternions@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 9:32:22 AM UTC-6, matmzc%ho...   
   gtempaccount.com wrote:   
   > Hi all. A massive spin one particle can have spin 1,0, or -1 in any   
   > spatial direction. But for the massless photon spin in the direction of   
   > motion must be 1 or -1. What is the easiest way to explain why 0 is   
   > excluded? I am not asking for a proof, which can be found in texts on   
   > QFT. But rather I would like a nice simple concept, if there is one,   
   > that makes it easy to understand. So what is the simplest way to   
   > explain the gist of the matter?   
   >   
   > Mike   
      
   The spin m = -1 and +1 correspond to the projection of the spin along   
   the momentum of the photon. The m = 0 can only occur if there is a frame   
   where the spin can be perpendicular to the momentum. This requires the   
   spin particle to be timelike with a mass. A photon has no measured   
   mass. This is known to within 10^{-40} or so. So there is no m = 0 case   
   for massless particles on null geodesics.   
      
   The m = -1 and m = +1 classically correspond to helicities. The rotating   
   polarization is clockwise or counterclockwise. This defines the   
   oscillation of the electric field vector transverse (perpendicular) to   
   the momentum with time.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca