From: ralph.frost@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 12:03:01 PM UTC-4, John Heath wrote:   
      
   > If I were to shoot a charged particle ,   
   > electron , at your two magnets   
   > that are repelling I would know is   
   > it is south south or north north that   
   > are facing each other.   
      
   Thanks for your answer to my question and pointing toward Hall   
   Effect detector devices.   
      
   Such detections, though, are still standardized in manufacture and   
   coupled through the  various orientational conventions that have   
   also been accepted and built up (curving left, curving right;   
   right-hand rule; current flow direction, etc.,).  Correct?   
      
   That is, I mean, detection of magnetic pole by Hall Effect device   
   is still not completely independent of the initially adopted ~spatial   
   convention or connection, is it?   
      
   Pardon me if I seem or am questioning accepted conventions, but it   
   seems like the empirical, experimental results always and only give   
   ~multiple-state-like results and we/physicists ~reduce those   
   multiple-states down to discrete, single, classical outcomes ONLY   
   BY mixing in large fractions of one or more of our other dimensional   
   frames of reference.   
      
   ...Sort of like there has been   
   an 'over-reduction' in some parts of science.   
      
      
   Thoughts?   
      
   Best regards,   
   Ralph Frost   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)