Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,699 of 17,516    |
|    Edgar L. Owen to Ralph Frost    |
|    Re: Are north and south magnetic fields     |
|    14 Jul 17 12:11:12    |
      From: Edgar@edgarlowen.com              On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 8:18:11 AM UTC-4, Ralph Frost wrote:       > Please pardon my poorly worded question. Are there ~independent methods       > of detecting a north pole/flux of a magnet from a south pole/flux?       >       > When I hold two rod magnets, one in each hand, and the center ends       > attract, I can obtain repulsion two ways by giving either magnet/hand       > one-half spin. Thus it appears that repulsion is attraction with       > one-half spin (and potentially, 'north is south with one-half spin'...)       >       > Generally, we are taught that one of these repulsions is 'north-north'       > and the other is 'south-south' (like-pole repulsion).       >       > I understand that if I am given an unmarked magnet, that I can assign       > its ends a north or south label by the way it orients, say, within the       > local geomagnetic field and ~relative to our prevailing planetary       > spatial orientation relative to the 'North Star' -- Polaris.       >       > But, I wonder, and my question is, other than the inherited, nested, or       > cross-dimensional correlation, does physics have any other means or       > measures that determine if a repulsive magnetic region is 'north-north'       > rather than 'south-south'? For instance, do they 'look different' under       > different spectral scannings?       >       > I'm curious about this because it seems like our words seem to imply or       > identify the existence of two separate 'things' whereas empirically,       > there is or seems to be only the one, rather entangled or inseparable       > 'thing'.       >       > Thanks in advance for any clarifications.       >       > Best regards,       > Ralph Frost       >       > Reality is nested structured~duality.              Ralph,              There actually aren't any such thing as magnetic poles because magnetic       field lines are continuous circles through the magnet itself. What we       call magnetic poles are simply the denser field lines entering and       exiting magnetic materials.              The non-existence of magnetic poles is easily seen in the magnetic field       circling a current carrying wire which has no poles at all.              Electromagnetism is explained in detail in my book Universal Reality 2.0       available on Amazon under my name.              Edgar L. Owen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca