Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,762 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to LuigiFortunati    |
|    Re: Twins and space station    |
|    06 Aug 17 10:20:38    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 8/6/17 8/6/17 5:13 AM, LuigiFortunati wrote:       > The "surprising causal effect" (real not apparent) [...]              This is NOT "real" in the sense that it is part of a valid model       of the world. Causality is not involved, as at the instant the       traveling twin measures (or computes) the home twin's age they are       separated by a spacelike interval.              Consider how the traveling twin would measure the home twin's age:       there would have to be an assistant at rest in the traveling twin's       inertial frame pre- positioned to be co-located with the home twin       at the instant of the measurement, who observes the home twin's       clock; this assistant would then send the measurement data to the       traveling twin. Do this immediately before and immediately after       the traveling twin turns around, and the assistants are located and       moving very differently -- it's no surprise that their measurements       are very different, as the assistants' clocks are synchronized very       differently with the traveling twin's clock. It is, of course, that       change in clock synchronization that is the underlying effect.              The home twin, of course, is completely unaffected and notices       nothing (except the traveling twin's assistants, who pass by in       opposite directions many years apart).              The whole notion of "what does the traveling twin measure" is highly       artificial, requiring outrageously impractical assistants; Fontenot's       "CADO frame" is merely a way to compute the highly artificial value       that such assistants would measure. As "all physics is local"       [Einstein and others], this is not part of any valid model of the       world; it is a measurement over a spacelike interval. The aspect       of this that proves its artificiality is the fact that it is       coordinate dependent -- coordinates are arbitrary human constructs       which Nature does not use, and no natural phenomenon can possibly       depend on such an arbitrary human choice....              What is real (i.e. unambiguous) is the comparison of the twins'       ages when they reunite. That is both independent of coordinates and       very non-local.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca