Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,797 of 17,516    |
|    Luigi Fortunati to All    |
|    Re: Meditations about the force    |
|    23 Aug 17 22:28:56    |
      From: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com              Il moderatore alle ore 18:37:00 del 19/08/2017 ha scritto:       > [[Mod. note --       > 1. Your examples are all contact forces. Consider the motion of a       > magnet attracted or repelled by a nearby magnet as an example of       > a non-contact force which does not drop to zero at any finite speed.       >       > 2. In an earlier moderator's note in this thread, I wrote that       > "The motion of a rocket moving in a vacuum without drag forces       > provides a counterexample."       > I'm sorry, I mistakenly left out a key phrase. What I should have       > written was       > "The motion of a rocket accelerating under its own thrust in a       > vacuum without drag forces provides a counterexample."       >       > 3a. If we analyze the falling bleacher in Newtonian mechanics and/or       > special relativyt, then when the scaffolding is not exerting any       > force on the bleacher, the bleacher does indeed accelerate       > (at an acceleration which is in fact just the local "little g").       > 3a. If we analyze the falling bleacher in general relativity, then       > when the scaffolding is not exerting any force on the bleacher,       > the bleacher is in free-fall (apart from air resistance, which       > is small in this situation). This means that the bleacher is       > accelerating with respect to the ground (which is not in free-fall);       > this relative acceleration is equal to the local "little g" in       > magnitude.       > -- jt]]              When the bleacher is on the scaffold there is no acceleration because       they are both still.              Instead there is a force and we can be measured with the dynamometer       that is nothing but a spring.              Just put this spring under the bleacher's feet and the spring       contracts: the force is there!              Really, the forces are 2, there is the force of the bleacher against       the scaffolding (direct force down) and there is the force of the       scaffolding against the bleacher (straight upwards).              There are forces and there is no acceleration because the two forces       are equal and opposite and therefore the resulting is zero.              But that does not mean that the forces there are not so much that the       dynamometer measures it.              At this point, the fundamental question is: what appening if these two       equal and opposite forces disappeared simultaneously?              It would happen that the resultant of the two forces would continue to       be nothing as before as BUT the forces are no longer there.              And the bleacher should be suspended in the air without dropping!              Because the bleach is precipitated, the two forces can not disappear       both!              --       Luigi Fortunati              Credere e' piu' facile che pensare       Believing is easier than thinking              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca