On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 7:39:41 AM UTC+1, ben...@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 7:44:08 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:   
   > > On Saturday, August 19, 2017 at 2:42:17 AM UTC-5, ben...@hotmail.com   
   wrote:   
   > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 6:35:27 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell   
   wrote:   
   > > > >  ....   The connection with gravitons is interesting ....   
   >   
   > Say the gravitational force was a weak colour force.  Like QED colour,   
   > but much weaker.  QED colour could even be a braided version of   
   > gravitational colour and hence be a stronger force cf rope is stronger   
   > than cotton.  Gravitational colour as an unbraided version of QCD colour   
   > might therefore be more plentiful than QCD colour and so maybe there is   
   > 'more' gravitational colour than QED colour in the gluon, and even the   
   > QED particles could have gravitational colour.   
   >   
   > Could a single gluon exchange produce both a gravitational-colour pull   
   > and a QCD-colour pull simulataneously?  And could a photon with   
   > gravitational colour but no net QCD colour simultaneously QED-repel two   
   > electons and gravitationally attract them?   
   >   
   > Can a single, massless gluon escape its neighbouring quarks to exert a   
   > gravitational-colour pull further afield?   
   >   
   > Is it absolutely essential for a graviton to have spin 2, or is that   
   > only when mass is being used as a charge, rather than a colour charge?   
      
   Three incorrect uses of 'QED colour' instead of 'QCD colour'. The only   
   intended use of QED was in "QED-repel'.  I thought that I had already   
   corrected this during editing, but apparently not.  Sorry.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)