From: goldenfieldquaternions@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 1:39:41 AM UTC-5, ben...@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 7:44:08 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:   
   >> On Saturday, August 19, 2017 at 2:42:17 AM UTC-5, ben...@hotmail.com wrote:   
   >>> On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 6:35:27 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:   
   >>>>  ....   The connection with gravitons is interesting ....   
   >   
   > Say the gravitational force was a weak colour force.  Like QED colour,   
   > but much weaker.  QED colour could even be a braided version of   
   > gravitational colour and hence be a stronger force cf rope is stronger   
   > than cotton.  Gravitational colour as an unbraided version of QCD colour   
   > might therefore be more plentiful than QCD colour and so maybe there is   
   > 'more' gravitational colour than QED colour in the gluon, and even the   
   > QED particles could have gravitational colour.   
   >   
   > Could a single gluon exchange produce both a gravitational-colour pull   
   > and a QCD-colour pull simulataneously?  And could a photon with   
   > gravitational colour but no net QCD colour simultaneously QED-repel two   
   > electons and gravitationally attract them?   
   >   
   > Can a single, massless gluon escape its neighbouring quarks to exert a   
   > gravitational-colour pull further afield?   
   >   
   > Is it absolutely essential for a graviton to have spin 2, or is that   
   > only when mass is being used as a charge, rather than a colour charge?   
      
   Assuming the graviton really is an entanglement of two STU dual gluons   
   this does not in turn interact by an color force, or STU dual color   
   force. It behaves just as a graviton with no internal gauge   
   structure. the di-gluon here is colorless and that gauge field is not   
   accessible to the "outside."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)