home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.research      Current physics research. (Moderated)      17,516 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 15,813 of 17,516   
   ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   
   Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay   
   02 Sep 17 18:16:47   
   
   On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 8:31:25 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:   
   > On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 1:39:41 AM UTC-5, ben...@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 7:44:08 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:   
   > >> On Saturday, August 19, 2017 at 2:42:17 AM UTC-5, ben...@hotmail.com   
   wrote:   
   > >>> On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 6:35:27 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:   
   > >>>>  ....   The connection with gravitons is interesting ....   
   > >   
   > > Say the gravitational force was a weak colour force.  Like QED colour,   
   > > but much weaker.  QED colour could even be a braided version of   
   > > gravitational colour and hence be a stronger force cf rope is stronger   
   > > than cotton.  Gravitational colour as an unbraided version of QCD colour   
   > > might therefore be more plentiful than QCD colour and so maybe there is   
   > > 'more' gravitational colour than QED colour in the gluon, and even the   
   > > QED particles could have gravitational colour.   
   > >   
   > > Could a single gluon exchange produce both a gravitational-colour pull   
   > > and a QCD-colour pull simulataneously?  And could a photon with   
   > > gravitational colour but no net QCD colour simultaneously QED-repel two   
   > > electons and gravitationally attract them?   
   > >   
   > > Can a single, massless gluon escape its neighbouring quarks to exert a   
   > > gravitational-colour pull further afield?   
   > >   
   > > Is it absolutely essential for a graviton to have spin 2, or is that   
   > > only when mass is being used as a charge, rather than a colour charge?   
   >   
   > Assuming the graviton really is an entanglement of two STU dual gluons   
   > this does not in turn interact by an color force, or STU dual color   
   > force. It behaves just as a graviton with no internal gauge   
   > structure. the di-gluon here is colorless and that gauge field is not   
   > accessible to the "outside."   
      
   Thank you for your replies and your expert views.   
      
   As soon as I posed the question as to whether or not   
   QCD colour could double for gravitational colour, I   
   realised that I had been lazy in avoiding having two   
   separate types of colour sources.  I have since worked   
   on gravitation having a separate colour set and have   
   inserted that idea into my naive preon model. To my   
   surprise, it gave me a way of unifying the four forces   
   and I have written a report (7 pages) on this and   
   published it today on vixra:   
      
   http://vixra.org/abs/1709.0021.   
   "Hexark and Preon Model #8 and the Unification of   
   Forces: a Summary"   
      
   Even with my model #7 a few weeks ago, I could not   
   see how unification made sense. But now, in   
   new Model #8, I seem to have progressed to a   
   unification method that makes sense, at least   
   to me.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca