Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,813 of 17,516    |
|    ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell    |
|    Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay    |
|    02 Sep 17 18:16:47    |
      On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 8:31:25 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:       > On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 1:39:41 AM UTC-5, ben...@hotmail.com wrote:       > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 7:44:08 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:       > >> On Saturday, August 19, 2017 at 2:42:17 AM UTC-5, ben...@hotmail.com       wrote:       > >>> On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 6:35:27 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:       > >>>> .... The connection with gravitons is interesting ....       > >       > > Say the gravitational force was a weak colour force. Like QED colour,       > > but much weaker. QED colour could even be a braided version of       > > gravitational colour and hence be a stronger force cf rope is stronger       > > than cotton. Gravitational colour as an unbraided version of QCD colour       > > might therefore be more plentiful than QCD colour and so maybe there is       > > 'more' gravitational colour than QED colour in the gluon, and even the       > > QED particles could have gravitational colour.       > >       > > Could a single gluon exchange produce both a gravitational-colour pull       > > and a QCD-colour pull simulataneously? And could a photon with       > > gravitational colour but no net QCD colour simultaneously QED-repel two       > > electons and gravitationally attract them?       > >       > > Can a single, massless gluon escape its neighbouring quarks to exert a       > > gravitational-colour pull further afield?       > >       > > Is it absolutely essential for a graviton to have spin 2, or is that       > > only when mass is being used as a charge, rather than a colour charge?       >       > Assuming the graviton really is an entanglement of two STU dual gluons       > this does not in turn interact by an color force, or STU dual color       > force. It behaves just as a graviton with no internal gauge       > structure. the di-gluon here is colorless and that gauge field is not       > accessible to the "outside."              Thank you for your replies and your expert views.              As soon as I posed the question as to whether or not       QCD colour could double for gravitational colour, I       realised that I had been lazy in avoiding having two       separate types of colour sources. I have since worked       on gravitation having a separate colour set and have       inserted that idea into my naive preon model. To my       surprise, it gave me a way of unifying the four forces       and I have written a report (7 pages) on this and       published it today on vixra:              http://vixra.org/abs/1709.0021.       "Hexark and Preon Model #8 and the Unification of       Forces: a Summary"              Even with my model #7 a few weeks ago, I could not       see how unification made sense. But now, in       new Model #8, I seem to have progressed to a       unification method that makes sense, at least       to me.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca