Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,840 of 17,516    |
|    Luigi Fortunati to All    |
|    Re: Newton vs. Einstein    |
|    22 Sep 17 22:09:52    |
      From: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com              Poutnik giovedì 21/09/2017 alle ore 08:58:38 ha scritto:       >> Newton claims that gravity is a force, Einstein denies it: for him it       >> is not a force (it is something else).       >>       >> It is obvious that both can not be right: if gravity is a force, Newton       >> is right and Einstein is wrong, and if it is the reverse Newton is       >> wrong and Einstein is right.       >>       >> It can not be otherwise!       >>       > It can be otherwise.       >       > IF Einstein used space and time the same way as Newton,       > Newton would be right and Einstein wrong.       >       > IF Newton used space and time the same way as Einstein,       > Newton would be wrong and Einstein right.       >       > But as both used space and time differently,       > both are right within definitions and assumptions of their theories.              "Strength" does not depend on space or even time.              --       Credere e' piu' facile che pensare       Believing is easier than thinking       Luigi Fortunati              [[Mod. note -- What's the operational definition of a force? We often       use Newton's 2nd law, measuring a force by the acceleration it imparts       on a test mass. That in turn requires an operational definition of       acceleration... which clearly does depend on our measurements of space       and time intervals.       -- jt]]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca