Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,855 of 17,520    |
|    rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: Newton vs. Einstein -- both at the s    |
|    25 Sep 17 22:00:42    |
      On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 12:43:21 AM UTC-5, rockbr...@gmail.com wro=       te:       > On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 1:30:37 AM UTC-5, Luigi Fortunati wrot=       e:       > > Newton claims that gravity is a force, Einstein denies it: for him it       > > is not a force (it is something else).       > Let's throw a wrench into the gears here!       [A 5-D family of metrics that includes Schwarzschild and Newton as instance=       s]              Compare:       Bargmann structures and Newton-Cartan theory       C. Duval,* G. Burdet, H. P. K=C3=BCnzle, =E2=80=A0and M. Perrin       Physical Review D Volume 31, Number 8, 1841-1853.       1985 April 15              However, they only deal with the case a = 0 and do not generalize       to non-zero a.              > The metric (and 0 constraint)       > dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 - 2aU/(1 + 2aU) (x dx + y dy + z dz)^2/(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)       > + 2 dt du + a du^2 - 2U dt^2 = 0       > with the proper time ds given by       > ds = dt + a du              ... where U is the potential per unit mass. For a point-like source       of mass M that's U = -GM/r, where r^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca