Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,863 of 17,516    |
|    J.B. Wood to All    |
|    Re: Newton vs. Einstein    |
|    27 Sep 17 10:02:45    |
      From: arl_123234@hotmail.com              Hello, all, and I should like to correct some errors in my previous       post. It should've read:              Hello, and at the risk of over simplification, if it behaves like a       force in the Newtonian sense, then it is a force. From a cause and       effect (e.g., the ability to do work on a mass) standpoint the genesis       of the force is irrelevant. It's akin to the vector (cross) product in       3D being a "pseudo" (axial) vector (and not a tensor) as opposed to       being a "real" (polar) vector. The vector product has both magnitude       and direction, so it fits that definition of a vector and works quite       well in applied math/engineering. The analogy here is axial vector =       fictitious force and polar vector = real force.              Sorry for the confusion. Sincerely,              --       J. B. Wood e-mail: arl_123234@hotmail.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca