Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,873 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom    |
|    Re: Twins and space station    |
|    03 Oct 17 15:30:38    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 10/1/17 10/1/17 12:07 PM, Nicolaas Vroom wrote:       > On Monday, 25 September 2017 01:59:52 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote:       >> On 9/24/17 9/24/17 3:56 PM, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:       >>> [...] Length contraction here is obviously an illusion.       >>       >> Not so. An "illusion" could not have physical consequences, but       >> "length contraction" does. For instance (1) the magnetic forces from       >> current-carrying wires, (2) the correspondence between fixed-target and       >> intersecting-beam cross-sections, and (3) the frequency/wavelength of       >> free-electron lasers.       >       > Is there "length contraction" involved in these 3 examples?       > If yes then please explain one.              (1) For a wire carrying a current involving moving electrons, in the rest frame       of the wire it remains electrically neutral (the power supply generating the       current ensures this is so). So a nearby charged particle at rest in that frame       experiences no EM force from the wire and its current. But a charged particle       moving parallel to the wire at the same speed as the electrons sees the ions of       the wire (i.e. the atomic nuclei) as "length contracted", and the electrons as       not, so in its frame there is a net positive charge on the wire, and it feels       an       EM force. In the wire rest frame we call this "magnetic force", while in the       moving frame it is "electrostatic force". This is much more general that my       simple description, and when worked out numerically it is correct; I believe       that Perkins's book on E&M goes into this in detail.              (2) scattering an unpolarized particle beam from an unpolarized target is       cylindrically symmetric, and we measure the differential cross-section as a       function of polar angle. For a fixed-target experiment the target is at rest in       the lab; for a colliding-beam experiment the center-of-mass is at rest in the       lab. To reconcile these two measurements at a given center-of-mass energy, one       must invoke "length contraction".              (3) a free-electron laser consists of an energetic electron beam traveling       through a magnetic field that alternates transverse directions in space,       typically every 10-20 cm over a length of several meters (the magnets are at       rest in the lab). As the beam is "wiggled" by the magnetic field, it oscillates       with the frequency it sees the field alternate -- this generates radiation of       that frequency, and for quantum reasons this can be a laser. In the lab this       radiation is measured, and to account for the observed frequency, that 10-20 cm       alternation must be reduced by the "length contraction" formula in the beam       rest       frame.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca