Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,883 of 17,516    |
|    lbjohnson1949@yahoo.com to All    |
|    Re: Twins and space station [repost]    |
|    08 Oct 17 23:52:25    |
      > On 10/1/17 10/1/17 12:07 PM, Nicolaas Vroom wrote:       >The question is have these effects any physical consequences.       >The answer is yes when you consider these effects in gravitational       >context. The reason are the gravitons (the speed of the gravitons)       >which (influence) originate from their retarded positions as 'observed'       >now. With 'observe' I mean: felt, influenced              No. You've inadvertently created a paradox that doesn't exist. By       invoking gravitons you've defined your example via gravitational       field; yet you paradoxically use Newtonian mechanics when you specify       the position of the source as the matter itself.              When you decide to use a field method then you must specify where       in the field the boson originates. When you do that you'll see there       is no paradox as the graviton must originate at the leading edge       of the field.              If you use Newtonian mechanics then you're assuming instantaneous       interactions; and you still have no paradox.              Brad              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca