Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,897 of 17,516    |
|    John Heath to Tom Roberts    |
|    Re: protons , anti protons and lithium    |
|    12 Oct 17 17:55:55    |
      From: heathjohn2@gmail.com              On Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 5:36:47 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:       > On 10/11/17 6:46 PM, John Heath wrote:       > > At Fermilab they needs to focus a beam of anti protons. [done with a       lithium       > > lens ...] How can an anti proton make it through 4 inches of solid lithium       > > without hitting a proton ?       >       > More than 90% of the anti-protons get through the Li lens with only multiple       > scattering, and the focusing is much stronger than the multiple scattering.       As       > the moderator said, "solid" lithium is mostly intra-atomic space as the       > anti-protons see it.       >       > > The anti proton negative charge only increases the chances of a proton hit.       >       > These are 8 GeV anti-protons, and their negative charge has only a tiny       effect       > on the cross-section to interact with a nucleus [#]. At 8 GeV the total       > cross-sections for protons and anti-protons differ by about 1% with an       errorbar       > that is larger than the difference.       >       > [#] You are probably thinking that the negative anti-proton will       > be attracted to the positive Li nucleus, and thus be deflected       > to hit it more often than a positive proton (which would be       > repelled). In fact, these 8 GeV anti-protons are so stiff it is       > easier to move the nucleus than deflect the track, and that is       > quite small because the anti-proton track is near each nucleus       > for such a short time that there is essentially no time for the       > EM force to accelerate it closer to the track. (This is a rather       > loose, classical description.)       >       > Tom Roberts              Hmmm interesting. 90 percent make it to the end. At 8 GeV the mass       is ballpark 10 times normal. It should be scooting along at a good       .99c . I can see why a Coulomb force is not that relevant at these       speeds. I was wondering how much of a problem lithium temperature       is with 500 k amps going through it plus a few annihilation here       and there? Lithium is not the best conductor , probably .01 to .1       m ohm for a tube that size. From what you know is keeping the lithium       tube from over heating critical or well under control?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca