Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,951 of 17,516    |
|    Robert L. Oldershaw to John Heath    |
|    Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?    |
|    12 Jan 18 08:07:49    |
      From: rloldershaw@amherst.edu              On Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 3:43:04 PM UTC-5, John Heath wrote:       > On Sunday, December 17, 2017 at 5:21:09 PM UTC-5, Phillip Helbig (undress to       > reply) wrote:       >       > QUOTE       > However, they require that we are in the       > centre of a large overdense region, which seems improbable on other       > grounds.       > END QUOTE       >       > This is an interesting point. A counter argument came to mind. If one       > were to wager, bet, where they are in the universe then guessing one is       > from the denser part of the universe would increase the odds of winning       > the wager.              Not "overdense"!              Actually PH, like LC, appears to have misread the paper, or...       Here is a quotation from the conclusions:              "The resolution of this instability creates the same anomalous       accelerations as the cosmological constant, without assuming it. The       model makes testable predictions. If correct, it would imply that we       live within a large region of approximate uniform under-density that is       expanding outward from us at an accelerated rate relative to the SM. The       idea that the Milky Way lies near the center of a large region of       under-density has already been proposed and studied in the physics       literature. (See [4] and references therein.)"              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca