home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.research      Current physics research. (Moderated)      17,516 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 15,951 of 17,516   
   Robert L. Oldershaw to John Heath   
   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   
   12 Jan 18 08:07:49   
   
   From: rloldershaw@amherst.edu   
      
   On Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 3:43:04 PM UTC-5, John Heath wrote:   
   > On Sunday, December 17, 2017 at 5:21:09 PM UTC-5, Phillip Helbig (undress to   
   > reply) wrote:   
   >   
   > QUOTE   
   > However, they require that we are in the   
   > centre of a large overdense region, which seems improbable on other   
   > grounds.   
   > END QUOTE   
   >   
   > This is an interesting point. A counter argument came to mind. If one   
   > were to wager, bet, where they are in the universe then guessing one is   
   > from the denser part of the universe would increase the odds of winning   
   > the wager.   
      
   Not "overdense"!   
      
   Actually PH, like LC, appears to have misread the paper, or...   
   Here is a quotation from the conclusions:   
      
   "The resolution of this instability creates the same anomalous   
   accelerations as the cosmological constant, without assuming it. The   
   model makes testable predictions. If correct, it would imply that we   
   live within a large region of approximate uniform under-density that is   
   expanding outward from us at an accelerated rate relative to the SM. The   
   idea that the Milky Way lies near the center of a large region of   
   under-density has already been proposed and studied in the physics   
   literature. (See [4] and references therein.)"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca