Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,952 of 17,516    |
|    John Heath to Robert L. Oldershaw    |
|    Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?    |
|    12 Jan 18 17:54:55    |
      From: heathjohn2@gmail.com              On Friday, January 12, 2018 at 3:07:53 AM UTC-5, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:       > On Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 3:43:04 PM UTC-5, John Heath wrote:       > > On Sunday, December 17, 2017 at 5:21:09 PM UTC-5, Phillip Helbig (undress       to       > > reply) wrote:       > >       > > QUOTE       > > However, they require that we are in the       > > centre of a large overdense region, which seems improbable on other       > > grounds.       > > END QUOTE       > >       > > This is an interesting point. A counter argument came to mind. If one       > > were to wager, bet, where they are in the universe then guessing one is       > > from the denser part of the universe would increase the odds of winning       > > the wager.       >       > Not "overdense"!       >       > Actually PH, like LC, appears to have misread the paper, or...       > Here is a quotation from the conclusions:       >       > "The resolution of this instability creates the same anomalous       > accelerations as the cosmological constant, without assuming it. The       > model makes testable predictions. If correct, it would imply that we       > live within a large region of approximate uniform under-density that is       > expanding outward from us at an accelerated rate relative to the SM. The       > idea that the Milky Way lies near the center of a large region of       > under-density has already been proposed and studied in the physics       > literature. (See [4] and references therein.)"              A part of the big bang I do not hear talked about is time dilation       caused by dense mass. As this dense mass starts to spread out it is less       dense therefore less time dilation. Not accelerating away so much as       time running faster. What we observe for distant galaxies is a balancing       act between Doppler effect and the rate time passes. There is no way to       tell which is the greater of the two without a very long ruler.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca