home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.research      Current physics research. (Moderated)      17,516 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 15,980 of 17,516   
   John Heath to SEKI   
   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   
   01 Feb 18 10:53:58   
   
   From: heathjohn2@gmail.com   
      
   On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 4:43:22 PM UTC-5, SEKI wrote:   
   > On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 6:58:58 PM UTC+9, John Heath wrote:   
   > > On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 12:26:23 PM UTC-5, SEKI wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > According to my hypothesis, spin/polarization directions of paired   
   > > > particles are to be determined when they are produced, and are to be=   
      
   > > > biased in accordance with the experimental setting.   
   > > > Considering the nature of a photon produced by induced emission,   
   > > > isn't it apparent?   
   > > > Maybe, it will make more sense for you to forget Bell.   
   > > >   
   > > > By the way, I suppose that zero-point oscillations have the key to   
   > > > resolving other types of quantum paradoxes, though you may not agree.   
   > > >   
   > > > Thanks.   
   > > >   
   > > > SEKI   
   > >   
   > > There are those who would pray on their knees " Please let SEKI be   
   > > right ,   
   >   
   > Really?   
   > I welcome people with common sense.   
   >   
   > I cannot accept a belief that something (particle, information or   
   > whatever) can travel faster than the speed of light.   
   >   
   > [Moderator's note:  As far as I know, no-one claims that one can   
   > transmit information, or anything else, faster than the speed of light.   
   > -P.H.]   
   >   
   > That's all.   
   >   
   > Thanks.   
   >   
   > SEKI   
      
   Alice can send information faster than light to Bob. However Alice   
   and Bob have to get together over coffee to compare notes before   
   Bob can decode the information from Alice. In a practical sense   
   information can not be acted on faster than light. Is this a relevant   
   counter argument to information moving faster than light?   
      
   My counter argument would be Alice telling Bob ahead of time that   
   she will collapse not not collapse the entangled state in a   
   predetermined way. Now when Alice sends a message to Bob he can see   
   the information in Alice's message by setting up his detector to   
   block 100 percent of the photons a of polarity 0 degrees and receive   
   100 percent of photons at 90 degrees knowing ahead of time Alice's   
   actions and polarity settings. Unfortunately this is information   
   from the past predetermined so he still can not act on information   
   faster than light. In this case information can be seen by Bob as   
   being received faster than light with a draw back that it is old   
   predetermined information not new information.   
      
   The real problem from a physics point of view is information   
   traveled faster than light. Is the inability to act on such   
   information relevant to the point of the information getting there   
   faster than light?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca