Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,980 of 17,516    |
|    John Heath to SEKI    |
|    Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ    |
|    01 Feb 18 10:53:58    |
      From: heathjohn2@gmail.com              On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 4:43:22 PM UTC-5, SEKI wrote:       > On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 6:58:58 PM UTC+9, John Heath wrote:       > > On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 12:26:23 PM UTC-5, SEKI wrote:       > > >       > > > According to my hypothesis, spin/polarization directions of paired       > > > particles are to be determined when they are produced, and are to be=              > > > biased in accordance with the experimental setting.       > > > Considering the nature of a photon produced by induced emission,       > > > isn't it apparent?       > > > Maybe, it will make more sense for you to forget Bell.       > > >       > > > By the way, I suppose that zero-point oscillations have the key to       > > > resolving other types of quantum paradoxes, though you may not agree.       > > >       > > > Thanks.       > > >       > > > SEKI       > >       > > There are those who would pray on their knees " Please let SEKI be       > > right ,       >       > Really?       > I welcome people with common sense.       >       > I cannot accept a belief that something (particle, information or       > whatever) can travel faster than the speed of light.       >       > [Moderator's note: As far as I know, no-one claims that one can       > transmit information, or anything else, faster than the speed of light.       > -P.H.]       >       > That's all.       >       > Thanks.       >       > SEKI              Alice can send information faster than light to Bob. However Alice       and Bob have to get together over coffee to compare notes before       Bob can decode the information from Alice. In a practical sense       information can not be acted on faster than light. Is this a relevant       counter argument to information moving faster than light?              My counter argument would be Alice telling Bob ahead of time that       she will collapse not not collapse the entangled state in a       predetermined way. Now when Alice sends a message to Bob he can see       the information in Alice's message by setting up his detector to       block 100 percent of the photons a of polarity 0 degrees and receive       100 percent of photons at 90 degrees knowing ahead of time Alice's       actions and polarity settings. Unfortunately this is information       from the past predetermined so he still can not act on information       faster than light. In this case information can be seen by Bob as       being received faster than light with a draw back that it is old       predetermined information not new information.              The real problem from a physics point of view is information       traveled faster than light. Is the inability to act on such       information relevant to the point of the information getting there       faster than light?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca