From: heathjohn2@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 2:55:46 AM UTC-5, SEKI wrote:   
   > On Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 6:54:03 PM UTC+9, John Heath wrote:   
   > >   
   > > The real problem from a physics point of view is information   
   > > traveled faster than light. Is the inability to act on such   
   > > information relevant to the point of the information getting there   
   > > faster than light?   
   >   
   > I wrote "I cannot accept a belief that something (particle, information   
   > or whatever) can travel faster than the speed of light."   
   > As a matter of fact, my hypothesis was devised so as to resolve such a   
   > paradox.   
   > (If you think the word "paradox" is not appropriate, "mystery", "wonder",   
   > "nonsense" or the like can be substituted for it.)   
   >   
   > If you insist that hypothesis is not acceptable, you should point out a   
   fatal defect of it.   
   >   
   > Thanks anyway.   
   >   
   > SEKI   
      
   Yes but you are not paying the price for these words. You have to   
   stand tall and say entanglement test itself is false. Now you can   
   say it is not possible for an entangled particle / photon to effect   
   the other faster than light. If you run that one up the flag pole   
   I for one will salute if that helps you out.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)