Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,989 of 17,520    |
|    SEKI to Steven Carlip    |
|    Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ    |
|    04 Feb 18 19:00:36    |
      From: seki.hajime01@gmail.com              On Sunday, February 4, 2018 at 5:11:33 PM UTC+9, Steven Carlip wrote:       > On 2/1/18 11:55 PM, SEKI wrote:       >       > Here are some ideas that don't work. You can't say that when       > the photons are produced, they already "know" the settings       > of the detectors.              Did you read the first post on this topic?              According to my hypothesis described there, spin/polarization       directions of paired particles are to be determined when they are       produced, and are to be biased in accordance with the experimental       setting.                     > Experiments have been done in which the       > detector settings are randomly changed after the photons       > are already in flight. You can't say that the experimental       > results are misleading because not all of the photons are       > actually detected. This "detection loophole" was always a       > stretch, but now it's been experimentally closed.       >              Thank you very much for important information.              SEKI              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca