Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,998 of 17,516    |
|    questionsphysics13@gmail.com to Jos Bergervoet    |
|    Re: Amplitude of coherent light from sta    |
|    07 Feb 18 13:50:02    |
      [[Mod. note --       A3: Please.       Q3: Should I avoid top posting on this newsgroup?              A2: Because, by reversing the order of a conversation, it leaves the        reader without much context, and makes them read a message in an        unnatural order.       Q2: Why is top posting irritating?              A1: It is the practice of putting your reply to a message before the        quoted message, instead of after the (trimmed) message.       Q1: What is top posting?       -- jt]]              THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ANSWER.              The incoherence of stars light means that there is a stochastic       phase function of time which breakes its coherence? I wander to       which extent the stars light can be considered coherent (for short       times?), since I understand that coherence is necessary for       interferometry with star lights.              Thanks              On Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 10:14:34 PM UTC, Jos Bergervoet wrote:       [[Mod. note -- 28 excessively-quoted lines snipped here. -- jt]]       > Sun, with magnitude of -27: irradiation = 1kW/m^2 (below atmosphere).       >       > One magnitude step is 4 dB, is 10^0.4 times less power. Bright stars       > have magnitude around 0, so 10^(-27*0.4) * 1000 W/m^2       >       > This power density is E-field squared divided by wave impedance,       > the latter is mu0*c ~= 367 Ohm. So E-field strengths: (approximately)       >       > magnitude -27 ==> 600 V/m (Sunlight)       > magnitude 0 ==> 2.5 mV/m (One star of top-5 of brightest sta=       rs)       > magnitude 6 ==> 150 uV/m (Weakest stars the eye can see)       >       > Incidently, the signal from a radio station is also in the order       > of 100 uV/m. (Of course sensitive receivers can detect much weaker       > signals, just like big telescopes can see much fainter stars).       >       > These are amplitudes of the total EM signal, all frequencies       > (wavelengths) added together to one time-dependent E-field.       >       > --       > Jos              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca