Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,010 of 17,516    |
|    ben6993@hotmail.com to All    |
|    Re: page time and quantum error correcti    |
|    14 Feb 18 17:02:03    |
      LC,       Thank you for your pointer, on FQXi, to Strominger for an introduction       to BH hairs. I have seen two of his 2017 videos of conference sessions       at Cambridge and Edinburgh.              1. I suspect (by analogy with my "Rasch pairs" work making 1-D metrics       from binary judgments made on pairs of mundane classical objects) that       real particle pairs (for Hawking radiation) can only originate in a       spacetime. So in the limit as the (stretched) horizon is asymptotically       approached there is less and less chance of a real fermion pair being       created. Maybe this could be related to the trans-planckian problem?       If I understand it well enough, the trans-planckinan problem is that the       pairs have huge energy pushing back their pair creation to the time of       the BH creation (and hence before the spacetime is lost on a stretched       horizon). That would seem to fit in with pair creation needing to be set       in a spacetime. Has the trans- planckian problem been overcome or has       it been pigeon-holed while work pushes ahead?              2. I have a number of other questions but will limit them to one or two       related to CCCs. Can Penrose's CCC nodes and BH's stretched boundaries       be equivalent. One seen from inside our universe (query being inside a       BH) and the other seen within our universe (looking at a BH from outside       the BH)? Could the CCC node have hairs too? Up until recently I thought       of a CCC node as being a singularity (a BEC of soft photons in one       state), but my rasch work suggests that the CCC spacetime could break       down gradually. Likewise, doesn't the internal metric of a BH break down       gradually as the Page Time is appproached?              The smaller the confinement, the larger the energy required. QCD->       QED/weak -> gravity. The less energy the bigger the theatre of       operations. Do gravitons formed from very soft photon entanglements have       a role connecting very large spacetimes to one another?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca