From: seki.hajime01@gmail.com   
      
   On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 1:58:46 PM UTC+9, Tom Roberts wrote:   
   > On 2/26/18 9:05 AM, richalivingston@gmail.com wrote:   
   > > [treating the null interval between emission and detection literally]   
   >   
   > But one can have entanglement for massive particles, for which the   
   > interval between emission and detection is not zero.   
   >   
   > Note also that entanglement does not involve "the nonsense of one   
   > detector determining, instantaneously, the result at a detector outside   
   > its lightcone", it only yields a CORRELATION between detectors' results.   
   >   
      
   Let's assume that the source is located at the origin of Cartesian   
   coordinate system.   
   In some experimental settings, each of emitted paired particles is   
   detected at the same time. In this case, a detection of a particle   
   can never affect the other detection.   
   So, in the Bell's context, entanglement is considered to be an illusion,   
   whether emitted paired particles are massless or not.   
      
   Am I wrong?   
      
   SEKI   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)