Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,064 of 17,516    |
|    J.B. Wood to All    |
|    Elementary Textbook Clarification    |
|    29 Mar 18 10:20:20    |
      From: arl_123234@hotmail.com              Hello, everyone. I continue to be puzzled by a relativity issue:       Initially two persons have two synchronized clocks an are located at the       same point in space. One person, B, starts moving away from person A at       some velocity. We tend to view person A as "stationary" wrt person B       and we know that person B's clock runs slower relative to person A's       clock. But if it's all relative why can't we consider person B as       "stationary" and consider person A in motion? But wouldn't that mean       that now person A's clock would be running slower relative to B's? I       know I'm missing some fundamental relativity issue(s) here. My thanks       to anyone who can clear this up. Sincerely,       --       J. B. Wood e-mail: arl_123234@hotmail.com              [[Mod. note -- This is essentially the twin paradox. Wikipedia has a       nice discussion:        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox       -- jt]]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca