home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.research      Current physics research. (Moderated)      17,516 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 16,064 of 17,516   
   J.B. Wood to All   
   Elementary Textbook Clarification   
   29 Mar 18 10:20:20   
   
   From: arl_123234@hotmail.com   
      
   Hello, everyone.  I continue to be puzzled by a relativity issue:   
   Initially two persons have two synchronized clocks an are located at the   
   same point in space.  One person, B, starts moving away from person A at   
   some velocity.  We tend to view person A as "stationary" wrt person B   
   and we know that person B's clock runs slower relative to person A's   
   clock.  But if it's all relative why can't we consider person B as   
   "stationary" and consider person A in motion?  But wouldn't that mean   
   that now person A's clock would be running slower relative to B's?  I   
   know I'm missing some fundamental relativity issue(s) here.  My thanks   
   to anyone who can clear this up.  Sincerely,   
   --   
   J. B. Wood	            e-mail: arl_123234@hotmail.com   
      
   [[Mod. note -- This is essentially the twin paradox.  Wikipedia has a   
   nice discussion:   
     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox   
   -- jt]]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca