Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,068 of 17,520    |
|    richalivingston@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: Elementary Textbook Clarification    |
|    30 Mar 18 23:40:04    |
      [[Mod. note -- Please limit your text to fit within 80 columns,       preferably around 70, so that readers don't have to scroll horizontally       to read each line. I have manually reformatted this article. -- jt]]              In addition to the Wikipedia article, I can summarize the differences:              -Person A is never accelerating, so no matter what inertial frame his        clock is observed from, that rate of A's clock will be constant.       -Person B is accelerating. When viewed from any inertial frame the rate        of B's clock will not be constant as a result of the acceleration.       -Person B, because they are in an accelerating frame, will see clocks        at different levels running at different rates. That is, a clock        at the nose of B's spaceship will appear to run faster than clocks        at the rear. This is gravitational red shift (which due to the        Equivalence Principle applies to any accelerating frame.)       -When B has finished accelerating and is moving at a constant speed,        all of B's clocks will appear to be running at the same speed, but        not necessarily showing the same time. B will have to re-synchronize        his clocks after the acceleration.              Hope that helps,              Rich L.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca