Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,115 of 17,516    |
|    Robert L. Oldershaw to SEKI    |
|    Re: A question about Hawking radiation    |
|    02 May 18 05:33:32    |
      From: rloldershaw@amherst.edu              On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 4:41:53 PM UTC-4, SEKI wrote:       > Hawking radiation postulates that particles with negative energy       > fall into a black hole.       >       > Einstein's gravitational equation is presented in terms of linear       > expression of energy-momentum tensor.       > So, I suppose that particles with negative energy, if actually       > present, are to be repelled by the black hole.       >       > Then, isn't Hawking radiation unrealistic?       >       > SEKI              Your question could be answered empirically except for one big problem.       In spite of the fact that the term "Hawking radiation" is bandied about       and hyped endlessly in the media and physics papers, it has never been       observed. Never.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca