Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,127 of 17,516    |
|    Jay R. Yablon to All    |
|    A question about Hawking radiation    |
|    05 May 18 06:54:52    |
      From: jyablon@nycap.rr.com              Over half a century ago, John Archibald Eheeler in his theory of       Geometrodynamics studied the Planck scale and showed how one could view       the vacuum as comprising a teaming array of Planck fluctuations with       positive energy offset by gravitational interactions with negative       energy and netting out to zero. Then, even the slightest imbalance       toward positive energies could be responsible for our positive energy       universe. But most importantly for the present discussion, every Planck       fluctuation has a Schwarzschild radius and so is also a miniature black       hole, which means it will also emit Hawking radiation. So if we had       detection devices as large as a galaxy, one would suppose that we would       be able to observe the Hawking radiation from these super-tiny black       holes. But of course we don’t. We only have experimental equipment that       brings us up to the TeV range.              Nevertheless, even from our hobbled observational platform 20 orders of       magnitude away, one would think that we must observe the residual       effects of this Planck scale Hawking radiation in some fashion. And I       can think of two right away: First, when we heat up a black body, it       emits a blackbody spectrum. Planck 1901. Second, when we look out into       the universe we see a cosmic microwave blackbody spectrum.              Now, I don’t believe in coincidences when it comes to physics. More to       the point, if the laws of nature are economical as I believe and I am       sure many of you believe, why would blackbody spectra appear from black       holes, and separately appear under other circumstances, and be totally       physically unrelated. Sort of how Benjamin Franklin first hypothesized       in one of the earlier episodes of scientific unification that the       lightning from the heavens is the same phenomenon as the static sparks       we feel and see when we rub our feet on the carpet and then touch metal.              So from this point of view, might it be that our definitive observations       of blackbody spectrum under known sets of conditions are actually       observations of Hawking radiation from miniature black holes viewed       relative to their origin from more than 20 orders of magnitude removed,       stimulated by whatever we are doing in our experiments such as raising a       material cavity to high temperatures?              To get right to the point: might it be that Hawking radiation is the       fundamental physical phenomenon, and that when we observe blackbody       spectrum in hot experiments or cosmic observations we are simply       observing derivative manifestations of the fundamental Hawking       phenomenon? In which case the answer to whether Hawking radiation is       realistic or has ever been observed would be: yes it is realistic, and       it is observed all the time.              JRY              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca