Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,133 of 17,516    |
|    Steven Carlip to Jay R. Yablon    |
|    Re: A question about Hawking radiation    |
|    06 May 18 20:36:14    |
      From: carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu              On 5/4/18 11:54 PM, Jay R. Yablon wrote:              > To get right to the point: might it be that Hawking radiation is the       > fundamental physical phenomenon, and that when we observe blackbody       > spectrum in hot experiments or cosmic observations we are simply       > observing derivative manifestations of the fundamental Hawking       > phenomenon? In which case the answer to whether Hawking radiation is       > realistic or has ever been observed would be: yes it is realistic, and       > it is observed all the time.              First of all, the sum of two black body spectra is not itself black       body unless the temperatures are exactly equal. So you'd need this       fundamental Hawking radiation to come from black holes that all       have exactly the same mass and spin.              But we also know that the CMB we observe comes from far away -- we can       see the effect as it passes through clusters of galaxies (the       Sunyaev--Zel'dovich effect). So somehow your black holes would have to       be far away. But then the spectrum of radiation reaching us from each       source would have a red shift that depended on its distance. That means       the spectra *wouldn't* be identical, and the sum wouldn't be black body.       To avoid this, you'd have to have black holes with varying masses and       spins that were tuned to depend very precisely on their exact distance       from the Earth.              But we also know that the CMB was hotter in the past -- we can measure       its past temperature by looking at its ability to excite low energy       molecular transitions in distant gas clouds. How you can reconcile       *that* with the tuning you'd need to get a uniform black body spectrum       on Earth, I have no idea.              In any case, though, your model would seem to depend on the Earth being       at the center of the Universe, surrounded by concentric shells of black       holes with masses and spin that were identical in each shell and       carefully tuned to vary from shell to shell so the radiation reaching us       all arrived with exactly the same spectrum.              This seems unlikely.              Steve Carlip              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca