Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,142 of 17,516    |
|    Gregor Scholten to All    |
|    Lorentz contraction of a rotated rod    |
|    12 May 18 22:22:35    |
      From: g.scholten@gmx.de              Hi all,              I recently asked myself by which factor a rod is lorentz-contracted that       is neither oriented in the direction of movement (typically x-direction)       nor in a perpendicular direction, but in a direction in between, e.g.       rotated by some angle against the x-direction in the (x,y) plane.              Since I did not find any resource about this that quickly, I examined       the result on my own:              Let phi be the angle between the rod's orientation direction and the       x-axis in the rod's rest frame S, then we have in S              Lx = L cos(phi)       Ly = L sin(phi)       L = (Lx^2 + Ly^2)^(1/2)              where L is the total length of the rod in S and Lx und Ly the particular       length in x- and y-direction.              Now consider a frame S' in which the rod is moving in x'-direction with       velocity v'. Then there are two questions coming up:              - What is the rod's length L' in S'?       - What is the orientation angle phi' against x'-axis in S'?              Obviously, the particular lengths Lx' und Ly' in S' in x'- and       y'-direction obey              Lx' = Lx / gamma = (1 - (v'/c)^2)^(1/2) Lx       Ly' = Ly              In other words: in x'-direction, the rod is simply lorentz-contracted by       factor 1/gamma, in y-direction, the rod's length is unmodified. This       yields for the total length L' in S'              L' = (Lx'^2 + Ly'^2)^(1/2)        = [(Lx^2 / gamma^2) + Ly^2]^(1/2)        = L [(cos(phi)^2 / gamma^2) + sin(phi)^2]^(1/2) (1)              We can check this result by comparing to the well-known results for phi       = 0 (rod oriented in x-direction) and phi = pi/2 (rod oriented in       y-direction):              phi = 0: L' = L (1 / gamma^2)^(1/2) = L / gamma -> OK       phi = pi/2: L' = L -> OK              Now what is the angle phi' in S'? We get              cos(phi') = Lx' / L'        = (Lx / gamma) / [L ((cos(phi)^2 / gamma^2)        + sin(phi)^2)^(1/2)]        = (Lx / gamma) / (Lx / gamma^2 + Ly^2)^(1/2)        = Lx / (Lx + gamma^2 Ly^2)^(1/2) (2a)              Or expressed by phi:              cos(phi') = cos(phi) / (cos(phi)^2 + gamma^2 sin(phi)^2)^(1/2) (2b)              We again check this:              phi = 0:        cos(phi') = cos(0) / (cos(0)^2 + gamma^2 sin(0)^2)^(1/2)        = 1 => phi' = 0 -> OK       phi = pi/2:        cos(phi') = cos(pi/2) / (cos(pi/2)^2 + gamma^2 sin(pi)^2)^(1/2)        = 0 => phi' = pi/2 ->              For phi < pi/2, i.e. cos(phi) > 0, we can re-write (2b) to              cos(phi') = 1 / (1 + gamma^2 tan(phi)^2)^(1/2) (2c)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca