From: nobody@invalid.invalid   
      
   Am 15.05.2018 um 20:12 schrieb Ed Lake:   
   > Since it is 26 pages long, I'm thinking I should have titled my new   
   > paper "REVIEWING Einstein's Thought Experiments."  If I was   
   > "simplifying" them, the paper shouldn't have been more than 2 pages   
   > long.   
   >   
   > But it "simplifies" the experiments by going through them step by   
   > step and performing the same experiment in different ways so that   
   > the results can be compared and analyzed. And it uses virtually NO   
   > mathematics.   
   >   
   > I'd be very much interested in any thoughts anyone might have here   
   > about how to improve my paper titled "Simplifying Einstein's Thought   
   > Experiments."  Here's the link: http://vixra.org/pdf/1805.0251v1.pdf   
   >   
   > Ed   
   >   
   Why should the dropped stone of "Dropped Stone Experiment #2." move   
   to the head of the train, when hitting the ground? It would NOT.   
      
   Rethink your Thought-experiment.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)