Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,181 of 17,516    |
|    Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman    |
|    Re: A question about spherical gravitati    |
|    14 Jun 18 07:25:57    |
   
   From: g.scholten@gmx.de   
      
   Sabbir Rahman wrote:   
      
   >> Ok, at least we have clarified now what you are talking about.   
   >>   
   >> So now, if we consider some spherically symmetric matter distribution   
   >> (no matter if it is a dust cloud, a rigid structure or a rigid structure   
   >> with a dust shell around) with a boundary (surface) at radial coordinate   
   >> r=R, it turns out that for r > R, the Schwarzschild metric S(r,t)   
   >> applies, whereas for r < R, somme different metric R(r,t) applies,   
   >> however with the property that for r approaching R from below, R(r,t)   
   >> approaches smoothly the Schwarzschild metric S(r,t):   
   >>   
   >> \lim_{r -> R} R(r,t) = S(R,t)   
   >>   
   >> So, at r = R, R(R,t) and S(R,t) are equal, whereas at R - dr, R(R - dr,   
   >> t) and S(R - dr, t) differ infinitesimally.   
   >   
   > My claim is that this is only true up to the time of formation of the   
   > black hole. After that, the two submanifolds become separated and this   
   > boundary condition no longer holds.   
      
   And this claim is wrong. My statement is true for R < rs (after   
   formation of the black hole) as well for R > rs.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca