Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,248 of 17,516    |
|    Gregor Scholten to Tom Roberts    |
|    Re: The tower of the twins    |
|    10 Jul 18 14:22:15    |
      From: g.scholten@gmx.de              Tom Roberts wrote:              >>> [... twin paradox] the reason why A's clock is ticking faster is physical.       >>       >> Physical, but frame-dependent.       >       > I disagree with both claims, and I think SR disagrees with both of these       > statements, too. This is partly about English word usage, but there is an       > important aspect of physics here:       >       > A's clock is NOT ticking faster (than B's), it is ticking at its usual rate,       the       > same rate as clock B. This is required by the first postulate of SR.       >       > One can say: "A ticks more times than B". One can also say       > "As measured in frame A, A ticks faster than B". But when       > one says "A ticks faster than B", one is talking about JUST       > THE CLOCKS; it is wrong              It is immediately clear from the context that here, "A's clock ticks       faster than B's clock" is a statement based on doing considerations from       A's frame, so this statement is equivalent to "As measured in A's frame,       A's clock ticks faster than B's clock".              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca