Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,259 of 17,516    |
|    Edward Prochak to Nicolaas Vroom    |
|    Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper    |
|    12 Jul 18 22:10:01    |
      From: edprochak@gmail.com              On Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 8:57:31 PM UTC-4, Nicolaas Vroom wrote:       > On Saturday, 7 July 2018 01:38:32 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote:       > >       > > It OUGHT to be clear that NOTHING we observe can be inconsistent with       > > the laws of physics -- we and any physical process we observe are       > > necessarily constrained by those laws. I did not "set down a rule" that       > > is not already contained in the phrase "laws of physics".       >       > I would like to comment on this in a rather 'open' sense.       > First of all identical processes (experiments) have identical descriptions.       > Different processes have different descriptions.       > Almost identical processes have almost identical descriptions. The       > differences in these descriptions we call the parameters of the processes.       > That all seems simple but the reality is more complex.       > The first problem is we humans. We humans write the descriptions based       > on our observations.              > Nicolaas Vroom              Very nice commentary. I cut it short       because I have a short and simple comment.              Of course the first variation of this that I learned       is in the form of two of Murphy's laws              Mother nature sides with the hidden flaw.       and       Mother nature is a b!^(#              I have heard other variations on this idea,       but a good friend of mine sums it up this way:              All theories are wrong. Some are useful.              Keeping that idea in mind has hopefully helped me       be humble in some of these discussions. I don't       have the ANSWER. I don't KNOW the TRUTH. I can       only accept the best information and best interpretation       available.                     Ed P              [[Mod. note -- Another variant on this idea is:        The Three Laws of Thermodynamics:        1) You can't win, only lose or break even.        2) You can only break even at absolute zero.        3) You can't get to absolute zero.       -- jt]]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca