Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,306 of 17,516    |
|    Lawrence Crowell to Luigi Fortunati    |
|    Re: The "net" force    |
|    29 Jul 18 09:54:54    |
      From: goldenfieldquaternions@gmail.com              On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 3:05:11 PM UTC-5, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       > Fixed one end of the spring to the ceiling and hanging a body at the       > other end.       >       > The point of contact (between the spring and the body) takes to       > accelerate downwards, then decelerates, then stops and then returns to       > accelerate upwards, thus initiating a continuous oscillating motion,       > synonymous with variable acceleration that (according to the second       > principle F=ma) requires the presence (at the point of contact) of a       > continuously variable net force (increases, decreases, changes to,       > returns to increase and so on without interruption).       >       > Since the only two forces acting at that point are the gravity and the       > tension of the spring, it is correct to state that the oscillation is       > due to the variability of the resultant (at the point of contact)       > between the force-weight action (on one side) and the reaction of the       > spring tension (on the other)?       >       > --       > - Luigi Fortunati              The force of gravity is of course constant. The force of the spring is F       = sin(ft), for f the frequency. So the force from the spring is       oscillating in magnitude and direction.              LC              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca