Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,317 of 17,516    |
|    richalivingston@gmail.com to Luigi Fortunati    |
|    Re: The weight in the elevator    |
|    06 Aug 18 19:11:24    |
      On Sunday, August 5, 2018 at 3:01:36 AM UTC-5, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       > I was careful to weigh *after* the initial acceleration and *before* of       > the final deceleration, both uphill and downhill.       >       > Furthermore, my electronic scale is very tested.       >       > Since the experiment is reproducible easily, I invite everyone to repeat       > it personally in their lifts and to report their results here.              Many scales show some hysteresis, and this result is consistent with       that. When going up the "weight" will be high during acceleration and       then go back to normal, giving a slightly high result. When going down       the "weight" will be low and then go back to normal, giving a slightly       low result.              You also don't state what precision and uncertainty your scale gives.       Did you make these measurements many times? Do you know how       consistently you get exactly these results? The significance of your       measurements depends critically on those properties of your scale.              Rich L.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca