Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,318 of 17,520    |
|    John Heath to Tom Roberts    |
|    Re: The weight in the elevator    |
|    07 Aug 18 07:04:39    |
      From: heathjohn2@gmail.com              On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 3:26:40 AM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:       > On 8/5/18 12:24 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:       >> On 5/08/2018 10:28 AM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       >>> I entered the elevator, I placed an electronic scale on the floor and,       >>> after starting, when the elevator bought steady speed uphill, I weighed       >>> myself and the display showed 83.5 kg.       >>>       >>> I repeated the operation during the descent at constant speed and the       >>> display showed a weight of 83.2 kg.       >>>       >>> Is it a strange result or does it correspond to the theory?       >>       >> I corresponds with the fact that electronic scales results are not       >> particularly reproducible, with a variation between measurements that is       >> less than 1% being not at all surprising. Vibration, muscle twitches,       >> etc. all contribute.       >       > Yes. Typical bathroom scales are rather limited in accuracy. I suspect       > his scale will vary by at least that 0.3 kg, weighing the same object       > multiple times.       >       > Using my electronic scale, when I weigh myself five times in a row the       > results vary by typically 0.4 or 0.6 pounds (the resolution of the       > display is 0.2 pounds). Moreover, I must weigh something else between       > measurements, because it clearly remembers the previous value and       > settles to it very quickly. So between weighings I sit down and measure       > just my legs. If I attempt to weigh myself standing on tip-toe, it       > usually times out with an error, because I cannot hold myself steady enough.       >       > (Experimental physicists apply their knowledge and       > experience to everything.)       >       > Tom Roberts              This is an interesting question. Yes a little friction in the scales       could lead to a hysteresis in the measurement for 83.2 vs 82.5       Kg. However this is a thought experiment for the theoretical results so       perfect scales may be assumed as well as zero change in gravity       gradient.              Under ideal condition of constant speed up and down how much does one       weigh. Let us call the weight 100 pounds for an even number and the       down and up speed 9 meters per second. If the elevator were to       accelerate at 9 meters per second squared then the weight should be 0       pounds moving down and 200 pound moving up. However the elevator is not       accelerating rather moving at a constant speed of 9 meters per       second. This makes for a complicated mix of a nonlinear gravity falling       rate of 9 meters per second squared with linear constant speed of 9       meters per second. With this in mind the down trip weight over time       should be 0 10 99 99.9 99.99 ... pounds. The up trip should be 200 190       101 100.1 100.01 ... pounds. Its weight would depend on when it is       measured. Note there is an energy conservation concern the numbers       given. The energy up must equal the energy down and 101 up does not       equal 99 down ,, what went wrong ?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca