Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,331 of 17,516    |
|    ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell    |
|    Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ    |
|    16 Aug 18 11:34:33    |
      On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 6:13:26 AM UTC+1, Lawrence Crowell wrote:              > ...       > If you had two negative masses they would attract. Because with the       > negative mass acceleration is towards a positive mass this experiment       > may not be able to determine if antimatter is really negative mass.       > ...              Hi Lawrence              I think that you have agreed with me that the (CERN Aegis) experiment       cannot determine whether antimatter is negatively signed for mass,       or not.              What that experiment can do is check if antimatter falls to earth       as does an apple. If it is found not to fall to earth that is       usually said to be destructive for GR. But it would also undermine       ordinary equations of motion as, in ordinary equations of motion,       all masses would fall to earth whatever their sign of mass.              In which case, whatever the findings of Aegis, antimatter could       have negatively signed mass. That would allow antimatter to cause       dark energy/matter. The instant reaction to that is that antimatter       cannot be dark matter as dark matter does not interact with EM.              However, my suggestion is that any antimatter with EM properties       will have long ago annihilated with EM matter. Leaving only the       neutrinos and antineutrinos to act as DE and DM. IMO this does not       disagree with what Susskind described in his online Stamford course       on Cosmology. The oddity is why there was any matter left over and       not annihilated in the early universe.              I think I have explained in my computer simulation why there was       an imbalance of matter and antimatter in the early universe: some       of the antimatter (assumed to be signed with negative mass) could       not keep up with the positive mass in the 'runaway motion' effect.       If correct, some of the neutrinos/antineutrinos, moving at speed       c, did keep up and they are what is causing DE and DM. Well, the       antineutrinos will be implicated in both DM and DE and the neutrinos       will only be involved in DM. (Reverse that if Jay is correct about       the neutrino sign anomaly.)              BTW when you write that "If you had two negative masses they would       attract" I assume that you are referring only to the directions of       the forces. When the forces are applied their effects are to produce       two accelerations which give repulsion, which is important in       allowing negative masses to cause DE in my simulation. Or, more       simply, two negative masses initially at rest with no other external       forces on them will move away from one another.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca