Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,359 of 17,516    |
|    jacques.fric@neuf.fr to All    |
|    general relativity, comparison of the re    |
|    27 Sep 18 06:04:28    |
      Hello              The timelike geodesic in Schwarzschild spacetime can be written in GR:              E^2 -1 = (dr/d_tau)^2 -2GM/r +(L/r)^2 - (2GM L^2)/r^3 (1)              where E is the relativistic conserved energy of a unitary mass, on the       geodesic and L its conserved angular momentum.              In Newtonian mechanics the Hamiltonian is              e = 1/2 (dr.dt)^2 - GM/r + (1/2)(l/r)^2 (2)              where e is the total conserved energy on the geodesic of a unitary mass       and l its conserved angular momentum.              In weak field, for r >> rs, we may neglect the last term in       (1/r^3). Usually one divide equation 1 by 2 for getting a similar form.              (E^2 -1)/2 = (1/2)(dr/d_tau)^2 -GM/r + (1/2)(L/r)^2 (3)                     But for convergence of equations (2) and (3), we have to assume that       e = (E^2 -1)/2.              That is the point that I do not understand: How an energy can be equal       to a square energy?              Thanks for help.       jacques              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca