Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,419 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati    |
|    Re: Circular motion without centripetal     |
|    14 Jan 19 08:26:28    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 1/13/19 4:23 PM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       > Circular motion without centripetal force is impossible. And then we       > must find a plausible explanation for this case. There is a rotating       > table and a disc without friction. If a person in the laboratory       > gently lays the disk on the rotating table and if the friction is       > (really) 100% absent, the disk, in the absence of friction, can not       > be dragged from the table, so it remains still while the table turns       > downstairs without disturbing.              Note the disk remains "still" relative to the inertial frame in which       the center of the rotating table is at rest.In discussions like this you       must always mention which frame or coordiantes you are using.              > For the observer who rotates with the table, the disk travels around       > a circle without ever moving away or nearing the center of rotation.       >       > How can we justify the rotary motion in the accelerated reference if       > no centripetal force acts on the disc?              In the rotating frame there must be a centripetal force: the disk is       not "fleeing away from the center", so there must be a centripetal force       to balance the (fictitious) "centrifugal force" in the rotating frame.       Note this centripetal force is every bit as fictitious as the       "centrifugal force" -- both are artifacts of using non-inertial coordinates.               In GR such fictitious "forces" are easy to identify:        they are components of the connection, and are explicitly        coordinate dependent. Remember that coordinates are        arbitrary human constructs, which nature does not use, so        quantities dependent on coordinates cannot possibly be        part of a valid model of nature. Hence we call such        forces "fictitious".              Stated differently: the "rotary motion" applies to the rotating table       and observer, not the disk.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca