Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,454 of 17,516    |
|    rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All    |
|    The physical relevance of macroscopic co    |
|    03 Apr 19 21:58:52    |
      To follow up on my earlier reply "Schroedinger Cat ... Physically Irrelevant":              The only way you're going to get any kind of macroscopic coherence is       with something that has no gravitational imprint. Because once it enters       the picture, there mere ability to see a gravitational difference, means       game over.              Spin bears no gravitational imprint. It can only affect torsion, and       unlike curvature, torsion cannot propagate outside of matter into free       space.              So, coherent superpositions involving spin lie outside the scope of what       I previously described.              Fast macroscopic-superposition-state generation by coherent driving       https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.013820              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca