Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,481 of 17,516    |
|    J.B. Wood to pellis    |
|    Re: The "Force" of Gravity    |
|    25 Apr 19 22:49:22    |
      From: arl_123234@hotmail.com              On 4/24/19 10:38 AM, pellis wrote:              > It seems to me that you're coming from a mental model based in Newtonian       > ideas and consequently the essential point is eluding you: that gravity       > doesn't "exist in" curved space-time, but rather it *is* curved       > space-time.              Hello, and so what we conclude is curved space-time is indistinguishable       from gravity. They're both manifestations of the same phenomenon (some       as yet-to-be-discovered property of the cosmos?) Kind of like talking       about "matter/mass" and "energy" separately when we know E = MC^2.              Ignoring for a moment gravity's "origin", I think it still qualifies as       a force since it can impart kinetic energy to a mass. We can observe       this behavior directly whereas the curvature of space-time can only be       demonstrated AFAIK by indirect means (e.g. gravitational lensing).              Now if I could somehow construct a device to generate a gravitational       field then I would also have the capability to warp space-time at will.       And if I could somehow distort space-time I would generate gravity       (which might be beneficial within a human-crewed, interstellar-capable       spacecraft.) Thanks for responding. Sincerely,              --       J. B. Wood e-mail: arl_123234@hotmail.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca