home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.research      Current physics research. (Moderated)      17,516 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 16,481 of 17,516   
   J.B. Wood to pellis   
   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   
   25 Apr 19 22:49:22   
   
   From: arl_123234@hotmail.com   
      
   On 4/24/19 10:38 AM, pellis wrote:   
      
   > It seems to me that you're coming from a mental model based in Newtonian   
   > ideas and consequently the essential point is eluding you: that gravity   
   > doesn't "exist in" curved space-time, but rather it *is* curved   
   > space-time.   
      
   Hello, and so what we conclude is curved space-time is indistinguishable   
   from gravity.  They're both manifestations of the same phenomenon (some   
   as yet-to-be-discovered property of the cosmos?) Kind of like talking   
   about "matter/mass" and "energy" separately when we know E = MC^2.   
      
   Ignoring for a moment gravity's "origin", I think it still qualifies as   
   a force since it can impart kinetic energy to a mass.  We can observe   
   this behavior directly whereas the curvature of space-time can only be   
   demonstrated AFAIK by indirect means (e.g. gravitational lensing).   
      
   Now if I could somehow construct a device to generate a gravitational   
   field then I would also have the capability to warp space-time at will.   
   And if I could somehow distort space-time I would generate gravity   
   (which might be beneficial within a human-crewed, interstellar-capable   
   spacecraft.)  Thanks for responding.  Sincerely,   
      
   --   
   J. B. Wood	            e-mail: arl_123234@hotmail.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca