From: helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   
      
   In article ,   
    writes:   
      
   >> Actually, it was Schrödinger who first showed that the Schrödinger   
   >> and Heisenberg pictures were the same thing, not Dirac.   
   >> At least, Moore claims this in his biography of Schrödinger.   
   >   
   > Well, then, you should have no difficulty in answering the question:   
   >   
   > What's the Heisenberg Picture version of Many Worlds?   
   >   
   > In case you forgot, states are timeless in the Heisenberg Picture,   
   > so there is nothing that changes or "splits".   
      
   > You won't find anything else in answer to my question; because the   
   > whole premise is false, and this very question is the gaping hole   
   > that exposes its flaw and unravels it.   
      
   By definition, different interpretations of quantum mechanics make the   
   same predictions---otherwise they would be different theories.  Of   
   course there are not many worlds in a non-many-worlds interpretation.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)