Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,545 of 17,516    |
|    kunz to PengKuan Em    |
|    Re: How to test length contraction by ex    |
|    30 Jun 19 11:06:04    |
      From: geee@ndd377.csd.dep              PengKuan Em writes:       > What is sure in my paper is that no direct measurement of length       > contraction has been done. This is what I'm trying to propose. Of cause       > most people think like you and believe that Special Relativity is       > flawless, because it has passed all tests it faced to until now.       > However, science needs direct proof.       >       > I will give more elements later.              I'd say the electromagnetic effect mentioned by Tom Roberts on 26 June       is a direct measurent. We see the charge density of the wire increased       (charges contracted) by measuring the coulomb force. There is no more       direct relation than that between charge density and electric force.              This is much more direct than any attempt to apply rulers to moving       objects, clock synch. etc.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca