Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,584 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom    |
|    Re: How to test length contraction by ex    |
|    13 Jul 19 17:53:25    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 7/12/19 5:11 PM, Nicolaas Vroom wrote:       > [...] The final step is to perform this experiment with two rods,       > with the same length at rest.              This experiment will fail, for the same reason as before: you cannot       make the ends of the rods flat to the accuracy required to observe the       "length contraction" of the moving rod.              > The physical issue if the moving rod (or train) becomes shorter              But SR predicts that the moving rod (or train) does NOT "become       shorter". It also predicts the moving rod WILL BE OBSERVED to "look"       shorter. While this does not negate your proposed experiment, your       repeated use of this incorrect phrase does indicate a fundamental       misunderstanding on your part.              Tom Roberts              [[Mod. note -- Note that in the final paragraph above, the author is       using "will be observed" in the technical sense of special relativity,       i.e., this refers to observations made by a CO-LOCATED observer so that       there are no speed-of-light propagation delays.]]       -- jt]]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca