From: eric@flesch.org   
      
   On 4 Jul 2019, Tom Roberts  wrote:   
   >On 6/30/19 2:53 AM, Eric Flesch wrote:   
   >> That means that the required length contraction doesn't need to be   
   >> reified into actual physical contraction.  This is just typical of   
   >> quantum uncertainties.   
   >   
   >Typical for QUANTUM uncertainties, but not here. SR is a purely   
   >classical theory.   
      
   Sure, but my point was that there isn't an actual physical   
   contraction.  I see that you're making that same point elsewhere in   
   this thread.  So you could have put more emphasis on where we agree   
   instead of simply rebutting.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)