Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,595 of 17,520    |
|    Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts    |
|    Re: How to test length contraction by ex    |
|    22 Jul 19 23:41:06    |
      From: nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be              On Tuesday, 16 July 2019 23:10:23 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote:       > On 7/14/19 7:56 PM, Nicolaas Vroom wrote:       > > IMO the most important question to answer is: what is the physical       > > explanation of length contraction.       >       > This is really geometrical: both "length contraction" [#] and "time       > dilation" [#] are simple geometrical projections. No physical properties       > of anything are changed, but when you measure such properties from       > frames relative to which an object is moving, you get values different       > from when it is at rest.              Personally I prefer the method described by JT in which in principle you       use one (inertial) reference frame and describe (measure) the complete       state of the universe simultaneous.              > Think about it: it must be possible for multiple observers >        in multiple frames to observe a given object, and they all >        get different values.              I agree with you when a rod is considered because in all these       measurements different physical time delays are involved, caused by the       light travel time of the photons along different path length. However       and that is important: these physical measurements don't cause any       physical change within the rod. The length does not physical change.              > Geometrical projections do just that,       > but ask yourself how any "physical change" of the object       > could do it....              But geometrical projections is mathematics ......              The problem is time dilation of moving clocks. If you want to know the       time of moving clock which moves away from you, you get a time count       that is always earlier than the actual time at the moment when you       receive that information. The reason is simple communication time       between sending and receiving any message (which is a function of       distance) Sending and receiving does not cause any physical effect on       the clocks in use.              What causes a physical effect is the internal operation of a clock if       you compare a moving clock versus a clock at rest. The moving clock runs       physical slower compared to a clock at rest. Depending about the       internal operation of the clocks the mathematics which describe this       physical behaviour are the Lorentz Transformations              Nicolaas Vroom              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca