Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,612 of 17,516    |
|    Ken Seto to PengKuan Em    |
|    Re: How to test length contraction by ex    |
|    04 Aug 19 10:17:56    |
      From: petemarlowesmith@gmail.com              On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 3:31:44 PM UTC-4, PengKuan Em wrote:       > Relativistic length contraction is theoretically predicted but not directly       > tested, which lead to incorrect interpretation of the theory illustrated by       > Bell's spaceship paradox and Ehrenfest paradox. But these paradoxes can help       > us designing experiments to test length contraction.       >       > Ideal direct experimental proof should contain the following steps:       > 1. Measure the tested object's length at rest, the value l0.       > 2. Put this object in motion.       > 3. Measure the object's speed, the value v.       > 4. Measure the object's length in motion, the value l.       > 5. Check if these 3 values verify length contraction law.       >       > For doing this experiment, the difference of length l0 ï=80- l should be       > in measurable range. If the object is a chunk of matter, l0 ï=80- l is       > not measurable. For example, matter objects with the highest speed we       > can make are satellites, whose speed is generally 7.8 km/s. If a       > satellite is made of a string of 100 km long, the value of l0 ï=80- l       > would be 0.03 mm, which is absolutely not measurable from the ground.       > This is why contraction of length has never been measured.       >       > Below I propose two experiments inspired from Bell's spaceship paradox       > and Ehrenfest paradox.       >       > Please read the article at       > PDF: How to test length contraction by experiment? https://pen       kuanonphysics.blogspot.com/2019/06/how-to-test-length-contraction-by.html       > or       > Word: https://www.academia.edu/39584663/How_to_test_length_con       raction_by_experiment              There is no material length contraction. A meter stick will return the       same length after a journey. What the LT length contraction mean: The       light-path-length (LPL) of a moving meter stick is predicted to be       contracted by a factor of 1/gamma. This prediction by the observer is       based on the assumption that the LPL of the observer’s meter stick is       its material length.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca