Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,630 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Herbert Glazier    |
|    Re: How to test length contraction by ex    |
|    24 Aug 19 06:22:31    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 8/22/19 2:26 AM, Herbert Glazier wrote:       > When an electron is accelerated to 99.99999999 of c and weighs 37,000       > times its rest mass how much has it length made shorter?              Hmmm. Weight does not make much sense for such a relativistic particle.              If you are thinking of its "relativistic mass", which is really its       energy, the ratio of a particle's energy to its mass is called gamma,       which is 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2); gamma is also the ratio of an object's       measured length while moving to its proper length (length at rest).       Note, however that we don't know the actual size of an electron, so your       question cannot be answered.               For speed 0.9999999999*c, I get a different value for gamma        than you give: 70,711. Beware of numerical problems in your        calculator.              > Does this effect its spin?              No.              > Its field?              Its (electromagnetic) field measured in its rest frame -- NO.       Its (electromagnetic) field measured in the lab -- YES, dramatically.              > Its flow?              I don't know what you mean by that.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca